Reclaim the Internet or Shut Down Debate?

EYEuse open source journalist techniques to examine some of the high profile examples of internet abuse promoted by Yvette Cooper MP to support her Reclaim the Internet Campaign.

The internet should be a way to give voice to the voiceless, to hold the powerful to account but instead some people are using it to shut down debate.

Reclaim the internet and let it be the nice, helpful, democratic place we know it could be. Yvette Cooper MP

In December 2015 Yvette Cooper MP launched an initiative called Reclaim the Internet.  The stated purpose of the project is to address online sexism and in her promotional interviews Cooper has cited high profile examples of online abuse against fellow Labour MP Jess Phillips, Science Broadcaster Dr Emily Grossman and activist and comedian Kate Smurthwaite.

EYEhas conducted open source investigations into these three incidents in an attempt to establish the frequency and seriousness of the ‘abuse’ these individuals received.

‘Online abuse’ is a modern manifestation of a very old problem and clearly  it needs to be addressed but, even after accepting that each individual has a very personal perception as to what should (or should not) be considered ‘offensive’ or ‘abusive’, EYEthink that Cooper’s choice of examples could ultimately undermine the stated aim of her campaign.

EYEdid find some evidence of behaviour that could reasonably be considered to be ‘abusive’ or ‘offensive’ in all three case studies.  That said, based on the available evidence, EYEalso found that media reports and personal claims about the level of abuse appear to have been grossly exaggerated.

All three examples show clear evidence of the conflation of significant amounts of criticism communicated by members of the public in the immediate aftermath of controversial, provocative, ill informed or potentially chauvinistic statements by these public figures.  Crucially, in all cases the available testimony of the ‘victim’ provides significant evidence to support this conclusion.

Judge for yourself:

JessGrossSmurf

For the first time ever, thanks to the explosion of social media, the world can talk to the world – unmediated. Information known by one person can be shared around the world in less than an hour – as evidenced by WikiLeaks. The whole world is firing up, like a teenage brain – burning neural pathways across the globe, making connections, expanding, leaping.  Caitlin Moran

Advertisements

3 Comments

Add yours →

  1. What open-source techniques did you use? Thanks.

    • Bruce, I searched for, collated and analysed as much relevant publicly available information as I could find, including newspaper articles, blog posts and most obviously twitter mentions for the relevant time periods. I then used this information to fact check the accuracy of the claims Labour MPs have made about these incidents.

      A key point about open source approaches is to provide the reader with sufficient sources to do their own fact checking and come to their own conclusions, as apposed to simply relying on one Bloke’s humble subjective opinion or, for that matter, sensational newspaper headlines.

      Another is to encourage others to help support or revise conclusions by contributing any additional information they may be aware of. If you think you can provide any data sources that serve to either support or undermine my conclusions then I would very much welcome your contribution.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: